In this image, Panda Geant and her children are riding on a ball made up of various colorful skulls, flying over a field of colorful flowers. Several bamboo trees are growing on the ball and one of the baby panda is holding one bamboo branch. There are two fire-like things which are probably will-o'-the-wisps, red and white, under the skull ball. In the sky behind them are white clouds which look like cotton candies, fluffy and soft.
All the living things with mouths in this image seem to be smiling and very happy, including the flower on the lower right corner, as the title "Happiness" indicates. The colors used are quite rich. Even in the mouth of Panda Geant, there are five colors including blue, yellow, orange, pink, green. All these correspond well with "happiness", except the giant skull ball and two fires which implies death. Does that mean that happiness does not exist if death is still there, that true happiness can only be found when death is overcome? The rainbow-like colors in the mouth of Panda Geant look like her teeth, which makes her laughing a teasing grin. This does not go well with her cuteness at all. It is like she is saying: "You want happiness? First learn how to travel through time and space like me." But on the other hand, I am also thinking that maybe she is saying: "Seize the day, and be happy, because everyone is on a skull ball."
2. I Think, Therefore I Am... A Dog by Nara Yoshitomo

This is an installation by Nara Yoshitomo. I found it interesting mostly because of its title "I Think, Therefore I Am... A Dog". It turns a famous saying by French philosopher René Descartes into a normal sentence in our daily life. The dog closes its eyes and seems to smelling the bone hung on a train from a steel pipe sticking out of the wall. We can only see half of the dog's body and imagine from its connecting to the wall that maybe it comes out of the empty wall directly. It implies that when people think, they are free, like the blank wall, but they cannot cut themselves away from the instinct or desire. People tend to be lured by all kinds of temptations, which draws them from rational thinking. Then we become animal again, no longer the advanced privileged species that can think and be free.
But after reading the text about Nara's interview, in which he says that his works has no definite meaning, and that viewers often see themselves in his works, I start to think that maybe I am the one who is not able to resist desires and temptations, like this dog. Is this necessarily a good thing or bad thing? Not sure.



